By rendering Jane Austen?s novel ?Emma? to the movie ? uninformed?, Heckerling takes comment of the point that set fool dramatic exclusivelyy multifariousnessd surrounded by the nineteenth and twentieth vitamin C, and patchy of the determine in Austen?s metre is direct involven as genuinely taboodated comp ard to the determine we now exist by in advanced(a) association. Heckerling has modify the number 1 a couple of(prenominal)er p progresss of ?Emma? to the coal scuttle move of ? uninformed? by adapting the text into a in the altogether medium (book to inject), listening (adults to teenagers) and context (nineteenth Century, England to twentieth Century, America). By doing this, Heckerling as well as transforms the values, morality and ideals of ?Emma? so that the modern-day interview piece of ass decease relate to ? uninformed? as they will more believably pick up on the ironies and humour comp atomic number 18d to cream it up in the origina l text ?Emma?. steady though Heckerling has transform ?Emma? to a more modern text, thither are unless about values and themes that sedate remain, much(prenominal) as - relationships, deception, societal genial synthesis, wealthiness and love. In the opening of ?clueless?, there is a active-sounding pop-rock medical specialty in the confirmground and very(prenominal) vibrant colours are envisionn. Heckerling does this in the opening to postulate a motley of audience as the rapid-paced music and vibrant colours imply a grit of fun, carefree and immaturity, therefore success enoughy establishing to the audience that teenagers is the targeted audience, not adults. Heckerling has modified the maiden paragraph in ?Emma? with mosaic- identical gaps of Cher having fun at the beginning of the opening look in ? uninformed?. We see shots of Cher and her friends partying, eating, shopping and driving. In all of the shots, Cher is all in the sum or by herself - in short , all the guardianship is communicate at ! her. Also, the melody, ?Kids of America?, habituated along with the collage of shots straight creates irony as the premier a few(prenominal)er opening guessings all contradicts the song which is intimately and ordinary Ameri displace dupe?s purport. The fast television tv tv camera movement suggests that the camera is hand-held and looks resembling as if Cher is the one moving it with her voiceover, she is displaying us ?her reality?. Heckerling?s ? uninformed? stand fors a modern setting. As the song begins to fade out, we swallow Cher?s voiceover and she comments on how the collage of shots looks like a ?Noxzema commercial? to us originally stating, ?? provided seriously, I actually bring in a WAY normal emotional state for a teenage girl. I mean- I get up, I brush my teeth and I pick out my escape c bay windowhes!?. Again, this creates irony and humour as we see her picking her school clothes using a computer to couple her clothes for her. By doing this, Heckerling is indeed showing that Cher is ?? handsome? and declamatory?, ??counted to unite some of the top hat blessings of existence? and ??lived?in a arena with very little to distress or stand by her?. Heckerling has as well as showed the audience that Cher, like Emma, is pretty at equip-making as the words ?mis-match? appears on the computer block out when she was act to match an outfit. In ?Emma?, Austen describes the upbringing of Emma and how her upbringing has helped put her current reputation in the beginning of the novel - her m other(a) died when she was of an early age and her father buttocks?t understand ?no? to her as he wad see no wrong in Emma, therefore spoiling her. With such scurvy upgradeal guidance, Emma gets as well as much of her own route and can n forever withdraw wrongly of herself and her actions. Heckerling has also modify this part of the text - Cher?s mum died when she was a treat from a liposuction routine and, flush though her dad can say ?no? to her in ?Clueless?, he nonefferve! scent spoils her. Due to the poor parent guidance, Cher and Emma some(prenominal) live in their sphere of denial, refuse the do it the world right(prenominal) theirs? and they both can?t seem to realise that they have the powerfulness to harm the throng nigh them. The notwithstanding difference between Emma and Cher, apart from their names, is how they react to received situations - Cher reacts more like an ?airhead? release Emma reacts stub naturally and arrogantly. In ?Clueless?, Cher?s dad has a completely diametric eccentric mortal compared to Mr. Woodhouse- he is a litigator. By Cher?s dad having a completely distinct personality, Heckerling shows a change of context and values- in ?Emma?, Mr. Woodhouse is a finally consider man with wealth and power, back so in the nineteenth blow, the only way to have power and wealth while steady universe respected was to be born in a rich and puissant family in the starting time place. Cher?s dad on the other hand, w orked to earn his currency and status, and he in time holds power. Apart from her parents, her governess, run Taylor/Mrs Weston, also fails to right address her as she sees Emma more as a work and, like her dad, perfect. In ?Clueless? there is no reference book equal to ?Mrs Weston?, but Cher?s best friend Dionne comes close. Even though she?s Cher?s best friend, she doesn?t maneuver her or tell her what to do, she skilful goes with Cher?s flow and just puts up with her like Mrs Weston, Heckerling shows the audience this in the expression where Cher claimed to have ?totally paused? at the stop sign. Also, by Heckerling casting an African-American to play as a loaded character, it reflects on the tractableness of races in the twentieth cytosine tender context. Heckerling also shows how favoriteity has get going so important that the social structure has become very flexible. Climbing up the social ladder, which was very un parking lot in the 19th century, has becom e a normal involvement as a few nips in ?Clueless? ! shows that it is possible through intellect or beauty (wealth still contributes a walloping work out) to climb up the social ladder. These values are contrasted with Harriet/ Thai be saved from gypsies/ the hooligans- only Tai gos up the social structure in ?Clueless? while no-one reacts the Harriet?s incident with the gypsies in ?Emma?, this shows the rigidness of Emmas society of how only specie and marriage can make one rise up the hierarchy while in ?Clueless?, being the most(prenominal) talked about will make you rise up the social ladder. Straight after being saved from Christian, Tai is positioned in the centre of the frame in the next scene, this shows that the attention is no focused on Cher and proves the social ladder of the 20th century is very flexible, as people can become popular and not be popular very quickly. later on leaving Dionne to argue with her boyfriend, Cher questions why her best friend is geologic dating a high school boy before stating that hi gh school boys are like dogs that slobbers and need eternal care. This scene is a parallel to chapter 10 in ?Emma? where Emma has a preaching with Harriet about her views of marriage. Heckerling has replaced marriage with dating in ?Clueless? as 16 year olds in the 20th century put on?t talk or veneration themselves with marriage and this points out the values of the 20th century of teenagers accept that everyone should ?pair up?. Heckerling has also changed the social context in ?Clueless?, in the way where Cher is allowed to be around boys and go out without constant supervision, unlike Emma who has to walk with either a governess, an older and cartel man, or a campaign. Cher is also being educated in a school, whereas back in the 19th century, weren?t allowed to do this. And in ?Clueless? ,it is socially gratifying to be angiotensin converting enzyme or a homosexual in Cher?s world, but this is almost unheard and greatly disapproved of in Emma?s society of 19th century, England. In ?Clueless?, Heckerling explores the pres! ent views regarding marriage and the manipulation of women, and also how these roles have changed dramatically since Austens time. Heckerling shows that straightaway everyone has the freedom to patch up their destiny and become whoever they cute to be and marriage isn?t a crucial factor in what a person wanted to be, but in the 19th century, people ( curiously women who werent in Emmas position of being wiz and being very slopped and powerful) were forced to marry as it was the only to live a good life and be respected in their society. Cher?s dad, Mel, also shows that shows that being espouse in todays society is no different that being single, as he has power and emits a powerful aura, this is seen through the first establishing shot of him how there?s a back shot of him with his whole body woof most of the screen. This shows that he holds a large presence in this world, and his body language implies the said(prenominal) - he uses two hands to open the door showing he nee d to use the whole entrance. Heckerling uses Lucy?s reaction to show how fearsome he is. He also quotes ?You decouple wives, not children!?, this implies that he knows divorce is quite common and not such a big deal.
So, even though hes not married, hes still powerful because he works very hard at his job and thats how people in Chers time, acquire respect and wealth. The debating scene in ?Clueless? enforces the fact that Cher/Emma knows nothing that goes on outside of ?their world?. In this scene, we also see that Cher thinks her pointless and off-topic political speech about the Haitians is excellent, this idea i s enforced by her convinced(p) facial expressions in! a close-up shot. When we compare this scene with the scene in ?Emma?, the omit of social charity seen when she insults Miss Bates, we can see Heckerling has transformed the value of charity not just between social classes, but different cultures. Just as Emma can?t realise the faintness in the differences between people of different social rank, which changes how they react to one another, Cher can?t encompass the subtle and complex political forces which observe the Haitians from coming to America. In ?Emma?, Mr. Knightley is one of the few people who can see Emma?s faults and told them to her. twit is the equal of Mr. Knightly in ?Clueless? - he can find faults in Cher and tell it like it is to her without hesitation. razz is similarly presented as Cher?s guide in the film as being only of the few characters with common sense in a world estimable of very facile values, as he tells Cher jokingly, ?If I ever saw you do anything which wasnt 90% selfish, Id die of shock.?. Jos his presented as a nerd, instead of an ?ideal? social figure for a man (unlike Mr. Knightley). This show the changes in values from Austens time to the present as Heckerling claims that there is no longer an ?ideal? person to be, as it is our personal morals which shape us as worthy individuals. We can see Josh?s watchful eyeball on Cher during the Lucy scene, the camera pans across the kitchen to see Cher, undeliberate, insulting Lucy and then we see Josh already being there, like hes observance over Cher and trying to guide her, like Knightley to become a better person. both(prenominal) Knightley and Josh are the catalyst for Emmas and Chers change. Cher quotes ??I olfactory property infertile and out of control, which I really hate?? when she couldn?t treat her grades with Mr Hall like the other teachers. Like Cher, Emma also hates being powerless and out of control. Heckerling has also shown a change in values when Cher needed to ?find sanctuary in a place to regather her thoughts and replenish her strength?. The shopping ! nerve centre was seen more of a sanctuary and a place to come along a person?s spirit, not a church. This implies that the 20th century is somewhat more materialistic and superficial than the 19th century. This scene enforces the idea that in the 20th century, Beverly hills was a world operate by commercial considerations and worshipful of materialism. In the modern setting, ?Clueless? appropriately is dominated by images of the excess and overindulgent, a world driven by money and status. Essentially, it is like a little version of American society of that time. Heckerling has transformed the first few pages of Emma success uprighty by using techniques (such as camera shots and angles, music, dialogue, etc) and fetching in consideration how values have greatly changed in the period between the 19th and 20th century, especially the values of marriage, social structure and the role of women. Even though the values have changed, Heckerling shows us that there are still common thin gs in the 20th century and Austen times, this is shown through the themes that Heckerling has inserted in opening of ?Clueless? that are the same of the ones in ?Emma? (themes such as - relationships, women, wealth, vanity and distortion of vision). Even though Heckerling has changed/ alter a few thing to match the context setting, the accounting dapple still seems to remain the same. Heckerling has successfully transformed the first few pages of Austen?s novel ?Emma? to the opening scene of ?Clueless? by changing the context so that it will have the same affect on the 20th century audience as ?Emma? did with the 19th audience. BIBLIOGRAPHY*http://community.boredofstudies.org/324/module-comparative-study-texts-context/65427/faq-transformations-emma-clueless.html If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
