Bowling for Columbine
        Why anyone would go into a shallow with tons of loaded guns and shot up their t all(prenominal)ers and peers is almost beyond grasp. But it happened. In the film, Bowling for Columbine, director Michael Moore takes an in perspicacity look at what could have possibly made these troubled-youth do such a thing. He looks are more than that the tragedy at Columbine High School, but withal at the NRAs effects on people, the 2nd amendment, more prepare shootings and the United States compared to other countries gun-control theories. He becomes a sociologist, exploring outside factors of the individuals. He does not look at the mental make-up of each individual who creates a crime with guns, but instead looks at how our society as a whole views guns and their utilises.
        Sociologists severalise that you run across two choices as to whether you abide by the rules of society; you hold in either deviance or conformity. Well what does America say about guns? If you use them are you defying a country or conforming to a great American-past time. At one transfer in the film Michael Moore uses symbolic interactionists theories to examine society. He looks at how our society looks at group membership, this is called differential association, and how belonging to a certain group could reduce your chances of being deviant.
He to a fault looks at the control theory, investigating the inner controls of people who use guns such as their morality lie conscience and ghostlike principals. Along with this Moore investigates the outer controls such as family, friends and the police, and he depend how these influence us not to deviate.
        Although going against norms is usually viewed as wrong, without these types of norms we would have complete chaos. When someone does do something taboo and goes...
If you command to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment